Thanks to this whole "Open Source" debate, I've learned a new catchphrase: OH JOHN RINGO NO. And now I've become aware of the source.
Now I've seen his books (with covers like those, how could you miss them?) taking up lots of shelf space at the chain bookstores around here, and I'd mentally put them in the Military SF is Not My Thing[*] pile next to folks like David Weber and Eric Flint. But these excerpts? Gah. I'm not surprised any more by mild squick in SF novels (thanks, Jack Chalker), but this stuff makes Chalker look like Tiptree - in writing style as well as gender relations. How does a guy like this get such a huge chunk of shelf space (outside of the theory that other authors' books sell and don't stay on the shelves)?
[*] At least conservative military SF; I dislike Starship Troopers, am equivocal about The Forever War and enjoy the Bill, the Galactic Hero series.
EDIT: Ringo replied to the review, and was a surprisingly good sport about it. (Though folks like Annes Rice and McCaffrey set that bar pretty low.) His response did have this gem, though:
If I needed the sun coming up in the east, I'd do it. It's that kind of story. Reality be utterly damned.
Which strikes me as summing up this series (assuming the review is accurate, which it seems to be if Ringo himself is saying "touche") excellently.
Defaults
9 years ago
2 comments:
I need to go disinfect my brain now. And that's just from the review.
Sunflower
I don't know about it being worse than Chalker. That review didn't even make it sound worse then Number of the Beast. If he made the whores he's collecting decide that becoming a whore was the best thing that happened to them, or if the hero went through a sex change and became a whore because that was the only way to become fulfilled... THEN I'd grant it was worse than Chalker.
Post a Comment